The basic reason for the special behaviour of dual endings might rather be that 
some of them originally had a disyllabic structure *-ahiH,  *-iHiH so that it 
was not reduced to a simple diphthong or vowel in Sandhi, and by analogy this 
was extended to other duals.
Malzahn assumes this also for the neuter in *-o-jh₁#V > *-aiH#V > *-ayy#V but 
here I would doubt that the laryngeal had such an impact since it clearly did 
not in cases of *ayHV > Skt.  ayV in internal position. But feminine forms in 
*-aH-iH and *-iH-iH are a different case. I discussed this in a review 
(Kratylos 49, 2004, pp. 53-55).

Best wishes,
Martin


Von: INDOLOGY <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Hock, Hans 
Henrich via INDOLOGY
Gesendet: Samstag, 24. Februar 2024 19:48
An: Dieter Gunkel <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [INDOLOGY] Sandhi and grammar

Thanks, Dieter, for this helpful reference.

If I read Malzahn’s arguments regarding the dual endings correctly, she 
suggests that their exceptional behavior can be attributed to the frequency of 
pre-pausal forms in numerals and vocatives, and that in the latter case 
prosodic factors may have played a role.

I’m not convinced, however, that this will explain the lack of sandhi; if 
anything, a short final vowel might be expected to undergo contraction even 
more readily than a long final vowel. Moreover, there are many forms in short 
final vowel (e.g. the vocative in -a of a-stems) that do not exhibit 
exceptional sandhi behavior. So the situation still looks murky to me.

Best wishes,

Hans Henrich


On Feb 24, 2024, at 11:36, Dieter Gunkel 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On the sandhi behavior of the dual endings and the linguistic history of their 
pragRhyatva, see Melanie Malzahn's dissertation, esp. ch. 2:
https://richmond.box.com/s/qp9cn2t34zb1akvwgylmhsdgda3ltpnk<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/richmond.box.com/s/qp9cn2t34zb1akvwgylmhsdgda3ltpnk__;!!DZ3fjg!9jgUjd-WaWmgFPajC1MuIy2Hykrhh_pAkeWtPJ4Awgl_RSwylNGRsGYjfAYIEYnwu7siMSK0CKf7fiRjjQ$>

Best wishes,

Dieter

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology

Reply via email to