Thank you! Very helpful. I’m still interested to know if there are close analogies in earlier writing with Rupa’s method of analyzing ecstatic states, for example comparing various emotional states to the physical elements, such as earth, water, fire, air etc. Or, are there analogies to his categories of sāttvika-bhāva and sthālyi-bhava? Etc.
I am distinguishing here between two related but discrete systems: that of rasa, and that of ecstatic states. Any help here is welcome. Best wishes, Howard > On Aug 18, 2024, at 11:59 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Dear Howard, > > You write: > > "Rūpa borrowed an analytic structure that is traced first to Bharata Muni, at > least 1500 years before Rupa, and then to Abhinavagupta who significantly > developed and refined rasa-vicāra at least 500 years before Rūpa. " > > According to my research, there were two parallel versions of medieval rasa > schools; Abhinavagupta representing the Vivarta version and Bhoja > representing the parinama version. Clearly, Rupa has developed his theories > based upon Bhoja's parinama version of aesthetics. > > More on this in my book "The Fifth Veda in Hinduism; Poetry, Philosophy and > Devotion in the Bhagavata Purana: > https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/fifth-veda-of-hinduism-9781784531997/ > > I hope it helps and all the very best, > > Ithamar > > > > ---------------------------------------- > Prof. Ithamar Theodor > Indian Studies > Zefat Academic College > [email protected] > Recent Publication: Special Issue on Gandhi, Israel and the Jews > https://link.springer.com/journal/11407/volumes-and-issues/27-3 > > > > > > > -----הודעה מקורית----- > מאת: INDOLOGY <[email protected]> בשם Howard Resnick via > INDOLOGY > נשלח: יום א 18 אוגוסט 2024 05:29 > אל: Indology List <[email protected]> > נושא: [INDOLOGY] Anaysis of ecstasy > > Dear Scholars, > > I would appreciate help with the following. In the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava > tradition, especially in works of Rūpa Gosvāmī (1489–1564) such as > Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu, but elsewhere too, there are systematic, technical > descriptions of ecstatic states, such as the aṣṭa-sāttvika-bhāvas etc. > > We know that in another, related analytic system, that of rasa-vicāra, > analysis of primary and secondary ‘rasas’ or mood/flavor of personal > relationship, Rūpa borrowed an analytic structure that is traced first to > Bharata Muni, at least 1500 years before Rupa, and then to Abhinavagupta who > significantly developed and refined rasa-vicāra at least 500 years before > Rūpa. Yet, as Gary Tubb once said to me, Rūpa, with real genius, applied to > Kṛṣṇa this already ancient system of rasa analysis and classification. > > So, finally my question: in his elaborate analysis and classification of > ecstatic spiritual states, such as sāttvika-bhāvas and sthāyi bhāvas, is Rūpa > again applying to Kṛṣṇa-bhakti an analytic system that already existed for > the analysis of non-Vaiṣṇava, or even Vaiṣṇava, literature? Or was the > technical analysis of ecstatic states an original contribution of Rūpa? I ask > because I suspect that once again Rūpa may have been applying to Kṛṣṇa-bhakti > an analytic system already current. > > Many thanks for any help with this! > > Howard > > > > _______________________________________________ > INDOLOGY mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology > > _______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
