Dear Jan and Andrew,

I see no problem with equating, say, dvitīyā with accusative, if all we are 
doing is comparing case marking and if we are focusing on Sanskrit. Problems 
arise in two ways: Not every expected case marking in languages like English or 
German corrrdonds to the same case marking in Sanskrit (as in Jan’s example 
with yaj-); that’s an inevitable problem in translating (no matter how well we 
explain things, students have to simply accept that different languages 
construe things differently). The other issue is that equating accusative with 
dvitīyā tells only part of the story, since Sanskrit has the sophisticated 
system of vibhaktis vs kārakas to which there is no precise counterpart in 
traditional western grammars, and some approaches may even operate either more 
abstract notions such as logical accusative rather than logical or underlying 
object, and others try to solve the “problem” by enumerating different 
“fuctions” of the “accusative”, such as object or adverbial.

So, in short, as long as we don’t expect anything more than corresponding terms 
for case marking there should be no problem

All the best

Hans Henrich

On Sep 5, 2024, at 08:51, Jan E.M. Houben via INDOLOGY 
<[email protected]> wrote:


Dear Andrew,
this is a nice list of approximate equivalents or equivalents under certain 
conditions.
The list is misleading (in both directions) if the =- signs are taken too 
literally.
As the list is attached to an online grammar the user should be able to find 
out that a word ending in dvitīyā may have other functions than the 
'accusative' and the 'accusative' may be expressed by other vibhaktis than the 
second (cp. in classical Sanskrit yaj 'sacrifice' in the sentence indram ajena 
yajati "to Indra he sacrifices a goat"). And the (partial) equivalence only 
works if 'accusative' is taken as a flat indication of a case ending, 
forgetting the conceptual basis of the term 'accusative'. Nor is ṣaṣṭhī simply 
the 'genitive', etc.  (Mutatis mutandis this applies to terms such as 
'optative' etc.).
Among printed Sanskrit grammars for students I believe that 
Devavāṇīpraveśikā<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://sanskritstudio.wordpress.com/2012/11/14/review-of-devavanipravesika-by-robert-p-goldman/*:*:text=Sutherland*20Goldman*20is*20a*20typical,serve*20as*20a*20reference*20book.__;I34lJSUlJSUlJQ!!DZ3fjg!6DMs1-4qH_cla8XEYi9phkbNO1rPfaa-xhLnVwPVshGCYmE8LlHYGEeRoT5UqUTVaX3KQPqn2kyZmg1-Shp806WANDi6$>
 by Goldman & Goldman is one of the first to give *again* Sanskrit grammatical 
terms for Sanskrit students at the introductory level.
*again*: Historically, introductions to Sanskrit since the nineteenth century 
are rather characterized by gradually filtering out Sanskrit grammatical terms 
(compare Max Mueller's 1870 Sanskrit grammar for beginners with the "New and 
abridged edition" of Max Mueller's grammar prepared by Macdonell and published 
in 1886). R G Bhandarkar in his  First Book of Sanskrit and Second Book of 
Sanskrit (from 1860s) tried to adopt "the terminology of the English 
Grammarians of Sanskrit" while "strictly following Panini, as explained by 
Bhattoji Dikshita in his Siddhantakaumudi" (unfortunately without giving a 
concordance of English and Sanskrit grammatical terms).

Best,
Jan Houben

On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 09:28, Andrew Ollett via INDOLOGY 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It is in no way complete/comprehensive, but I have a list here:

http://prakrit.info/vrddhi/grammar/#glossary<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://prakrit.info/vrddhi/grammar/*glossary__;Iw!!DZ3fjg!6DMs1-4qH_cla8XEYi9phkbNO1rPfaa-xhLnVwPVshGCYmE8LlHYGEeRoT5UqUTVaX3KQPqn2kyZmg1-Shp80wZUCX_z$>

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:20 AM rajam via INDOLOGY 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I’m also interested in this endeavor.

I’d like to have a Standard / most used / most needed list of Western 
Grammatical terms, so I can provide Tolkappiyan (tolkāppiyan) equivalents from 
the South for interested scholars.

Thanks and regards,
rajam


> On Sep 3, 2024, at 9:58 PM, Harry Spier via INDOLOGY 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Dear list members,
> Have any members made a list of western grammatical terms and their paninian 
> equivalents (preferably a searchable word document).  Abhyankar's Dictionary 
> of Sanskrit Grammar is good for getting the western grammatical terms, when 
> you know the Paninian  term, but I need a list going the other way , where 
> given a western sanskrit grammatical term such as for example: "accusative, 
> gerund, gerundive, optative" etc. etc. you can find the equivalent paninian 
> term .
>
> Thanks,
> Harry Spier
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology__;!!DZ3fjg!6DMs1-4qH_cla8XEYi9phkbNO1rPfaa-xhLnVwPVshGCYmE8LlHYGEeRoT5UqUTVaX3KQPqn2kyZmg1-Shp80x17RINp$>


_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology__;!!DZ3fjg!6DMs1-4qH_cla8XEYi9phkbNO1rPfaa-xhLnVwPVshGCYmE8LlHYGEeRoT5UqUTVaX3KQPqn2kyZmg1-Shp80x17RINp$>

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology__;!!DZ3fjg!6DMs1-4qH_cla8XEYi9phkbNO1rPfaa-xhLnVwPVshGCYmE8LlHYGEeRoT5UqUTVaX3KQPqn2kyZmg1-Shp80x17RINp$>


--

Jan E.M. Houben

Directeur d'Études, Professor of South Asian History and Philology

Sources et histoire de la tradition sanskrite

École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE, Paris Sciences et Lettres)

Sciences historiques et philologiques

Groupe de recherches en études indiennes (EA 2120)

johannes.houben [at] ephe.psl.eu<mailto:[email protected]>

https://ephe-sorbonne.academia.edu/JanEMHouben<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ephe-sorbonne.academia.edu/JanEMHouben__;!!DZ3fjg!6DMs1-4qH_cla8XEYi9phkbNO1rPfaa-xhLnVwPVshGCYmE8LlHYGEeRoT5UqUTVaX3KQPqn2kyZmg1-Shp80xvHNpfR$>

https://www.classicalindia.info<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.classicalindia.info__;!!DZ3fjg!6DMs1-4qH_cla8XEYi9phkbNO1rPfaa-xhLnVwPVshGCYmE8LlHYGEeRoT5UqUTVaX3KQPqn2kyZmg1-Shp80-JwaktY$>

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology__;!!DZ3fjg!6DMs1-4qH_cla8XEYi9phkbNO1rPfaa-xhLnVwPVshGCYmE8LlHYGEeRoT5UqUTVaX3KQPqn2kyZmg1-Shp80x17RINp$
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology

Reply via email to