On 18 Mar 2011, at 15:28, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > On 11-03-18 10:05 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >> Hmmm, but we know there're problems with doing this, right? >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-937 - Vladimir, did you get around to >> investigating that? > I have not found the root cause. Paul detected the problem in AS test > suite. I tested his AS configuration in our test suite and it worked > flawlessly. After that, I "outsourced" the investigation to Paul. Since > all our state transfer tests were passing I thought its worth > investigating AS setup. That's were the investigation died.
It "died" because we were too close to a 4.2.1.FINAL to risk changing something like this. Hence my proposal to leave FLUSH in by default but to allow a FLUSH-free config via a (temporary, 4.2.x only) system property while we investigate properly removing FLUSH in 5.0. Cheers Manik -- Manik Surtani [email protected] twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
