On 07/09/2011 18:04, Manik Surtani wrote: > On 2 Sep 2011, at 13:04, Joni Hahkala wrote: > >> Is there any performance numbers for infinispan? What kind of response >> times would be required from secure version and what they are now etc? > No had requirements as such, since I think anyone expecting to deploy a > secure data grid will expect performance tradeoffs. What sort of factors do > you envisage with the approaches you outlined below?
For ssl, you would have the problem of the handshake, you have two request-response cycles before you can even start to send the actual data. So, with anything else than intra cluster networking, you get bitten by the network latency. You can resume old ssl sessions, which save one request-response cycle, or you can keep the sockets open, and only do the handshake once, but at least keeping the sockets open doesn't scale so far. Then there is also the certificate checking, but that shouln't be that big of an issue unless you want to go for ultimate speed. With everything there is the overhead of encryption and possibly the signing, but that shouldn't be such a big slowdown. The Seam framework seems to be more of user authentication, and would probably be good for managing the authorization information. But for authentication between the nodes and clients maybe keys would be better, kind of like ssh is doing. Cheers, Joni > > -- > Manik Surtani > ma...@jboss.org > twitter.com/maniksurtani > > Lead, Infinispan > http://www.infinispan.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev