On 6 Oct 2011, at 15:52, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: > >> >> On 5 Oct 2011, at 16:53, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1396 >>> >>> While looking into this, I've discovered that we have been creating >>> executors in cache level components, where we're calling submit from >>> @Listener implementations. >>> >>> For example, BaseStateTransferManagerImpl.ViewChangeListener submits a >>> rehash task and TransactionTable.StaleTransactionCleanup submits a tasks to >>> break locks. >>> >>> Did the people that wrote these listeners (Dan & Mircea respectively) >>> consider defining listeners to be called asynchronously? i.e. >>> @Listener(sync = false) >> this can work indeed for BaseStateTransferManagerImpl.ViewChangeListener? >> This seems like a small change - can you modify that in the scope of >> ISPN-1396 or do you want me to look into it? > > BaseStateTransferManagerImpl.ViewChangeListener? Dan seems to disagree. You > meant TransactionTable.StaleTransactionCleanup instead? yes indeed :-)
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
