On 19 Apr 2013, at 05:07, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@infinispan.org> wrote:
> Why not. Only doubt I'd have is that other usages of the CHM are - I guess - > services registry and similar configuration tools, for which write > performance is irrelevant: your test measured puts, are there drawbacks on > gets or memory usage? > See the original announcement on concurrency-interest by Doug Lea, and the subsequent comments. The design is up here too. One of the goals was to drastically reduce memory usage with CHMv8. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency/8140 Interestingly, Netty uses a backported CHMv8 as well - apparently inspired by our inclusion of it in Infinispan. ;) https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/1052 -M -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid http://red.ht/data-grid
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
