I wouldn't want to deprecate CCL, I think it definitely has a purpose - at least in invalidation mode.
Even in replication mode, having a lazy alternative to state transfer may be useful. Maybe not for the topology cache, but it might make sense for large caches. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Mircea Markus <mmar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 21 May 2013, at 08:30, Tristan Tarrant <ttarr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 05/21/2013 08:58 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > >> Shouldn't it be enabled by default/enforced? > >> ^ Either that, or the cluster cache loader are used, both of which > serve the same purpouse. > >> > > I think what Mircea is getting at, is that there is an intention to > > deprecate / remove the CCL. I think that we can do that in 6.0 (with the > > CacheStore redesign) and remove all potential users of CCL (including > > the lazy topology transfer). > Mind reader :-) > > Cheers, > -- > Mircea Markus > Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
