On 21 May 2013, at 17:09, Dan Berindei <dan.berin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't want to deprecate CCL, I think it definitely has a purpose - at > least in invalidation mode. The only use case I'm aware of for invalidation is 2nd level cache and I don't think that needs a remote cache, Galder wdyt? > > Even in replication mode, having a lazy alternative to state transfer may be > useful. Maybe not for the topology cache, but it might make sense for large > caches. this makes me wonder: what would be the case in which one doesn't want to use state transfer for a distributed/replicated cache. Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
