On Jan 20, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Dropping AtomicMap and FineGrainedAtomicMap was discussed last week in the > F2F meeting [1]. It's complex and buggy, and we'd recommend people to use the > Grouping API instead [2]. Grouping API would allow data to reside together, > while the standard map API would apply per-key locking. > > We don't have a timeline for this yet, but we want to get as much feedback on > the topic as possible so that we can evaluate the options. +1 There's been a good discussion on this topic: http://goo.gl/WNs6KY > > Cheers, > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3901 > [2] > http://infinispan.org/docs/6.0.x/user_guide/user_guide.html#_the_grouping_api > -- > Galder Zamarreño > gal...@redhat.com > twitter.com/galderz > > Project Lead, Escalante > http://escalante.io > > Engineer, Infinispan > http://infinispan.org > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev