On 10 February 2014 09:02, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 27 Jan 2014, at 11:27, Dan Berindei <dan.berin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think it's way too early to discuss removing FineGrainedAtomicMap and >> AtomicMap, as long as we don't have a concrete alternative with similar >> properties. > > You have a point there, but we can’t ignore the feedback that says that > atomic maps are not being used because they are buggy, and instead they are > using grouping.
Let's not generalize too much, some are still doing the opposite and have commented on their good reasons ;-) > > Deeply, I think we have two ways of doing the same thing, which is confusing > from my POV, and one of them is not being used enough, or we’re not fixing > the stuff there. +1 but since as you say there is confusion, I'm not sure if they really are the same thing. I've asked for a detailed comparison but the discussion derailed. It would probably help a lot if someone from the Infinispan core team would reimplement the FGAM API on top of Grouping, making sure to guarantee the same semantics also in terms of concurrency, isolation and acidity. That would provide the implementation cleanup you'd all love, a migration path, and probably some deeper considerations on their differences; I also suspect there would be some roadblocks, potentially subtle differences which could then be better documented? > > Regardless of whether it’s too early or not, this email is trying to spark a > consolidation of the two technologies into a single solution that works for > everyone and we maintained it actively :) > >> Cache.getGroup(groupName) is just a method name at this point, we don't have >> any idea how it will compare to AtomicMap/FineGrainedAtomicMap from a >> transaction isolation or performance perspective. BTW, do we really need the >> group name to be a String? >> >> A good way to prove that the grouping API is a proper replacement for the >> atomic maps would be to replace the usage of atomic maps in the Tree module >> with the grouping API. Unless we plan to drop the Tree module completely… > > Tree was only ever meant as a bridge for JBC users to move to Infinispan. > Paul F et al tried to build HTTP sessions on top of that, it didn’t work. > Then they tried to do it on top of Atomic Maps, and it didn’t work either, > and finally they’re using grouping and seems to work? I don't think that proves that Atomic Maps where not working, if any it's a statement that grouping is a better fit for this specific use case? BTW having a use case which matches way better that the other just highlights that this is no duplicate functionality, but rather quite different stuff. From an Hibernate OGM perspective it would be great to have some more stability in not so old APIs, at least until there's a clearly documented migration to grouping. Sanne > > Cheers, > >> >> Cheers >> Dan >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Mircea Markus <mmar...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 21, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic <vblag...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > I agree with Erik here. Deltas are used in M/R and I've never detected >> > any problems so far. >> > On 1/21/2014, 1:39 PM, Erik Salter wrote: >> >> Please don't remove the Delta stuff. That's quite useful, especially for >> >> large collections. >> >> +1 to keep DeltaAware. Thanks for the feedbak >> >> >> >> >> Erik >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > infinispan-dev mailing list >> > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Mircea Markus >> Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > -- > Galder Zamarreño > gal...@redhat.com > twitter.com/galderz > > Project Lead, Escalante > http://escalante.io > > Engineer, Infinispan > http://infinispan.org > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
