Please don't remove the Delta stuff. That's quite useful, especially for large collections.
Erik -----Original Message----- From: infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Ruivo Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 6:33 AM To: infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Dropping AtomicMap/FineGrainedAtomicMap Hi, On 01/20/2014 11:28 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > Hi all, > > Dropping AtomicMap and FineGrainedAtomicMap was discussed last week in the F2F meeting [1]. It's complex and buggy, and we'd recommend people to use the Grouping API instead [2]. Grouping API would allow data to reside together, while the standard map API would apply per-key locking. +1. are we going to dropping the Delta stuff? > > We don't have a timeline for this yet, but we want to get as much feedback on the topic as possible so that we can evaluate the options. before starting with it, I would recommend to add the following method to cache API: /** * returns all the keys and values associated with the group name. The Map<K, V> is immutable (i.e. read-only) **/ Map<K, V> getGroup(String groupName); Cheers, Pedro > > Cheers, > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3901 > [2] > http://infinispan.org/docs/6.0.x/user_guide/user_guide.html#_the_group > ing_api > -- > Galder Zamarreño > gal...@redhat.com > twitter.com/galderz > > Project Lead, Escalante > http://escalante.io > > Engineer, Infinispan > http://infinispan.org > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev