On 01/30/2014 08:51 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 11:52 PM, Mircea Markus <mmar...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 1:42 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> By the way, people looking for that feature are also asking for a unified 
>>>> Cache API accessing these several caches right? Otherwise I am not fully 
>>>> understanding why they ask for a unified query.
>>>> Do you have written detailed use cases somewhere for me to better 
>>>> understand what is really requested?
>>> IMO from a user perspective, being able to run queries spreading several 
>>> caches makes the programming simplifies the programming model: each cache 
>>> corresponding to a single entity type, with potentially different 
>>> configuration.
>> Not sure if it simplifies things TBH if the configuration is the same. IMO, 
>> it just adds clutter.
> Not sure I follow: having a cache that contains both Cars and Persons sound 
> more cluttering to me. I think it's cumbersome to write any kind of querying 
> with an heterogenous  cache, e.g. Map/Reduce tasks that need to count all the 
> green Cars would need to be aware of Persons and ignore them. Not only it is 
> harder to write, but discourages code reuse and makes it hard to maintain (if 
> you'll add Pets in the same cache in future you need to update the M/R code 
> as well). And of course there are also different cache-based configuration 
> options that are not immediately obvious (at design time) but will be in the 
> future (there are more Persons than Cars, they live longer/expiry etc): 
> mixing everything together in the same cache from the begging is a design 
> decision that might bite you in the future.
>
> The way I see it - and very curious to see your opinion on this - following 
> an database analogy, the CacheManager corresponds to an Database and the 
> Cache to a Table. Hence my thought that queries spreading multiple caches are 
> both useful and needed (same as query spreading over multiple tables).
I would be all hands for this approach, but there's still one thing 
where it makes sense - Animal cache with Cats and Dogs.

Radim
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to