While we are on a wish list for 7.0.3. We have found a regression from Infinispan 6 on (FineGrained)AtomicMap that is seriously impacting Hibernate OGM.
ISPN-5088 We should get this one quickly to avoid people tripping over the concurrency concern the workaround implies. Emmanuel > On 15 Dec 2014, at 21:50, Erik Salter <an1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a few more that might be candidates for the 7.0.x branch. The > critical ones (for me) have to do with state transfer and locks. Some of > these are still pending, though. > > ISPN-5076 > ISPN-5030 > ISPN-5000 > ISPN-4546 > > There are a few optimizations. ISPN-5042, in particular, seems like a > quick win. For ISPN-5037 and ISPN-5032, I'll probably implement on my own. > > Also under the heading of optimizations -- one thing that's a real problem > with my cache configuration is the verbose nature of > OutdatedTopologyExceptions. They're thrown as RemoteExceptions, which > cause stack traces all over the place when a NonTx cache retries its > operation. (These actually crashed an indexer on my analytics engine > during a performance state transfer test.) Also, if the key ownership > hasn't changed, why throw them at all? > > ISPN-4695 > ISPN-4586 > > (If I'm on Santa's naughty list, I may have a crack at implementing them.) > > There are a few minor cosmetic things that are easily ported. > > ISPN-4989 > ISPN-5040 > ISPN-5052 > > > Thanks all, > > Erik > > On 12/4/14, 10:22 AM, "Erik Salter" <an1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I was asked to vote on a list of JIRAs for 7.0.3 and send it to the >> mailing list. The next iteration of my application is migrating from >> 5.2.x to 7.0.x, so I'm really focused on hardening and stability, >> especially WRT state transfer. Here are the ones I was looking at, mostly >> related to state transfer: >> >> - ISPN-5000 >> >> - ISPN-4949 (and related ISPN-5030) >> - ISPN-4975 >> - ISPN-5027 >> >> Notes on a few others I was looking at: >> - ISPN-4444, from the description, looks serious enough to include. I >> haven't looked at the commit in-depth; appears to be limited to keys in >> L1? >> - ISPN-4979 appears to be a substantial change. I would defer to the team >> about how risky of a change it is. >> >> And if ISPN-3561 makes it into a 7.0.3, I'd consider it a personal favor. >> >> Regards, >> >> Erik >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev