Thanks, Sebastian! I assume testing on GKE and minikube/openshift was successful?
On 14/06/17 13:15, Sebastian Laskawiec wrote: > Hey guys, > > Just a heads up, I've just created a PR that upgrades KUBE_PING to > 1.0.0.Beta1 [1]. As you probably seen in [2], 1.0.0.Beta1 was completely > rewritten and might behave slightly differently. > > Here is a summary of changes: > > * The latest KUBE_PING doesn't require embedded HTTP server for > discovery. Thus it is no longer required to expose port 8888 in Pods. > * The number of dependencies has been decreased. Currently we only > require JGroups and OAuth library. > * The new KUBE_PING works only with JGroups 4. There will be no > JGroups 3 support. > * Some of the environmental variables were shortened and we removed > `OPENSHIFT` prefix. So if you use `OPENSHIFT_KUBE_PING_NAMESPACE`, > you will need to change it to `KUBERNETES_NAMESPACE`. Please refer > to [3] for more information. > > I also switched default branch in Kubernetes Ping repository to master [4]. > > Thanks, > Sebastian > > [1] https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/5201 > [2] http://belaban.blogspot.ch/2017/05/running-infinispan-cluster-with.html > [3] > https://github.com/jgroups-extras/jgroups-kubernetes/blob/master/README.adoc > [4] https://github.com/jgroups-extras/jgroups-kubernetes > -- > > SEBASTIAN ĆASKAWIEC > > INFINISPAN DEVELOPER > > Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > -- Bela Ban | http://www.jgroups.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev