On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Yes. I've defined a rule that says that all members of groups named
> "release:<volumename>" can release <volumename>. I also allow the group
> "release" (or its members, really) to release *any* volume. I can
> forward the scheme code to this if you like.
>
> There are some drawbacks to this approach. Namely it requires giving one
> access to release any volume in the cell, or creating a separate group for
> each volume. Since you can't have nested groups, this is administratively
> inconvenient. This is one of the main reasons why I wish to rewrite this
> system. To support more flexibility configurable database is really needed.
What I'm planning on doing is allowing users to release any volume with
their prefix. i.e.
release:content.abc
could release any volume beginning with
content.abc.
etc.
Send me your scheme code, and I'll modify it to do the string
comparisons.
-b.
--
Brian W. Spolarich - ANS - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (313)677-7311
And if I die before I learn to speak,
Will money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?
