[ On Wednesday, April 26, 2000 at 08:05:04 (+0200), B-CK ANDREAS/TKELOV96ORD wrote: ]
> Subject: pam patch
>
> Patch to support pam password
> not so nice done but it's the same way netatalk and samba do it
This is a bad idea.
Security (including all authentication *and* any connection
authorisation) belongs only outside of CVS. CVS already supports SSH
(and RSH), and could easily support SSL and SRP, and maybe SASL too, in
the same way. Please consider using those existing mechanisms.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
