Noel L Yap writes: > > Hopefully, many eyes will tend to spot wild-pointer errors. I prefer the cybernetic eyes of Purify and similar tools -- I run a Purified version of CVS through the test suite every now and then and there are currently no errors (although there are still a *lot* of leaks). > The occasion I've had for requesting zero-byte allocations have been when > writing generic array structures that allows for zero elements. Much of the > algorithms were very much simplified if zero-byte allocations were allowed (and > returned NULL). Exactly. -Larry Jones Who, ME? Who?! Me?? WHO... Me?! Who, me??? -- Calvin
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Donald Sharp
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Larry Jones
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Donald Sharp
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Larry Jones
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Noel L Yap
- RE: question (preference?) about xmalloc Leeuw, Guus (G.)
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Paul Sander
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Paul Sander
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Noel L Yap
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Noel L Yap
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Larry Jones
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Greg A. Woods
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Noel L Yap
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Noel L Yap
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Paul Sander
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc John Macdonald
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Larry Jones
- RE: question (preference?) about xmalloc Cameron, Steve
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc Paul Sander
- Re: question (preference?) about xmalloc John Macdonald
