[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/14/2000 09:50:23 PM
>CVS with its own dedicated socket/port
>    run across SSH
>
>    Transport secured, but the CVS socket/port
>    is open to the world on the remote machine,
>    and hence is insecure there, and on the
>    remote machine's network.

If the data stream is encrypted, why do you call this insecure?  How secure is
secure?

>CVS using a non-socket/port transport like rsh or ssh
>    to connect to a server machine. "cvs server"
>
>    As secure as the transport.
>
>    E.g. requires account administration on the
>    machine on which cvs server will run.

Why is admin access necessary in this situation?

Noel




This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.

Reply via email to