On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:13:10PM -0500, David Thornley wrote: > Mike Little referred to "some previous cvs admin", and this is > precisely what happened in my case. Some previous CVS admin > put some of the rev numbers to 2.x, and there's no way I can put > them back to 1.x. You could probably do this using CVSFile (http://people.freebsd.org/~eivind/CVSFile-0.2.tar.gz) and a small perl script. This would, of course, invalidate any workspaces (checked out copies of the source) presently active. Note that I have not tested CVSFile with repositories that contain 2.x versions, and there may be bugs in CVSFile related to using such repositories - though as long as you don't directly overwrite your original repository, there should be no chance of data corruption. CVSFile lacks documentation - sorry about that. Eivind.
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Eric Siegerman
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement J. Cone
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Anybody converted VSS history to CVS? Laine Stump
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Rex_Jolliff
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement David Thornley
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement David Thornley
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Russ Allbery
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement John Macdonald
- When is it appropriate to update a major version... Eivind Eklund
- When is it appropriate to update a major version... Mike Jellison
- Re: When is it appropriate to update a major... Larry Jones
- Re: When is it appropriate to update a major... Laird Nelson
- Re: When is it appropriate to update a m... Greg A. Woods
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Cameron, Steve
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Stephen Rasku
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement John Macdonald
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Cameron, Steve
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement John P Cavanaugh