In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Steingold wrote: >> * In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> * On the subject of "Re: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: rename in cvs]" >> * Sent on Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:47:09 -0400 (EDT) >> * Honorable [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg A. Woods) writes: >> >> [ On , October 11, 2001 at 10:39:50 (-0400), Sam Steingold wrote: ] >> > Subject: Re: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: rename in cvs] >> > >> > why? this is the same file. >> no, actually it is not. > >yes, actually it is. >you want me to look at the world through the tool-imposed blinders.
In fact I have the same impression. It consistently *appears* as if Greg wants people to accept the limitations of CVS to an irrational degree. In his view, it appears, I must not only accept that CVS doesn't handle renames, but also stop wanting a version control system that handles renames. In fact, I must stop seeing file renames as legitimate version control events. Otherwise, presumably, my mind will somehow go to pieces imagining something that the selected tool doesn't provide. This may be far from the intent, but it sure reads that way, Greg! _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
