[ On Thursday, October 11, 2001 at 20:15:10 (GMT), Kaz Kylheku wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: rename in cvs]
>
> In fact I have the same impression. It consistently *appears* as if Greg
> wants people to accept the limitations of CVS to an irrational degree.
Well, if you don't want to accept it, what, EXACTLY, are you going to do
about it? Do you have a viable alternative tool waiting in the wings?
If so then why haven't you proposed it as an alternative?
> In his view, it appears, I must not only accept that CVS doesn't
> handle renames, but also stop wanting a version control system that
> handles renames.
That's not what I said at all.
> In fact, I must stop seeing file renames as legitimate
> version control events.
I certainly didn't say that either.
CVS doesn't support renames, but it provides enough mechanism to make it
relatively easy to manually track renames and to manually perform
operations on renamed files that CVS itself can never do internally.
Anything that can be done manually can, obviously, also be scripted.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
