--- "Thornley, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Noel Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > There you have it, yet another space where CVS > isn't > > ideal: XP. > > > No, XP in Java. The original XP people used > Smalltalk, > a dynamic object-oriented language, and I'd think > that > XP would work best when using a dynamic > object-oriented > language such as Smalltalk and Common Lisp. Doing a > quick Google search shows that people are talking > about > XP in Java, and selling stuff to support it, but > that > doesn't mean it's a good idea.
AFAIK, XP promotes "Refactor early, refactor often." If so, and given Greg's premise that refactorisation should be rare and well-thought-out, then CVS isn't good for within an XP environment. Noel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
