>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[ On Tuesday, February 26, 2002 at 23:51:29 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ] >> Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour
>> Yes, some of the tools I listed are nearly worthless (or at >> least have better alternatives). And in my world, "patch" also falls >> into that category. (I don't know why Greg seems to have a problem with >> this fact.) >I have no problem with the fact you consider 'patch' to be useless for >your needs. I do have a very major problem with the fact that you don't >have any alternative that's better for your needs. This is clearly why >you've had so much problems with file renames. Clearly you should be >using 'patch' (or desparately trying to find something equally capable) >because it solves problems you've apparently left un-solved and which >you've continually whined and moaned about in this forum for literally >years now. I use the "merge" program, which is way better for my needs. >--- End of forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs