Georg Wilckens writes: > > Hey, that's neat. Couldn't find that in the documentation, thanks for > the hint. :) :) Maybe I have an misconception regarding locking... can > CVS be safely used without locking? Couldn't there be some unsuspected > merges when two people commit a file shortly after each other?
Of course CVS can be safely used without locking -- the whole *point* of CVS it to allow *concurrent* versioning. I'm not sure what you mean by an "unsuspected" merge -- CVS won't allow you to commit a file that isn't up to date, you have to explicitly update first. Updating may merge changes, but it will tell you if it does. -Larry Jones Whatever it is, it's driving me crazy! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
