Larry Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Georg Wilckens writes: > > the hint. :) :) Maybe I have an misconception regarding locking... can > > CVS be safely used without locking? Couldn't there be some unsuspected > > merges when two people commit a file shortly after each other? > > Of course CVS can be safely used without locking -- the whole *point* of > CVS it to allow *concurrent* versioning. I'm not sure what you mean by > an "unsuspected" merge -- CVS won't allow you to commit a file that > isn't up to date, you have to explicitly update first. Updating may > merge changes, but it will tell you if it does.
Thanks Larry, I had quite some misconception regarding merging. I can see clearly now. :) Regards, Georg _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
