Michael Sterrett wrote: > All of this discussion is interesting to me, but what I'd really > like to see is something done about the sccs2rcs script. Is > there any real gain in continuing to ship it with CVS given the > fact that it doesn't seem to be maintained by anyone (at least, > no one wants to take responsibility for it) and it doesn't > pertain to the main functionality of CVS? Why not move it to > http://www.loria.fr/~molli/cvs-index.html as contrib/README > suggests and out of the official CVS tarball releases? What's > your opinion of this idea?
Personally, I think we should continue to include the current script. I used it successfully to convert our SCCS code repository from SCCS to CVS without any problems and I think a lot of people have. -- Stephen Rasku E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Software Engineer Web: http://www.pop-star.net/ TGI Technologies _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
