Michael Schiestl wrote: > > Hello, > > I am using the latest version of CVSNT in combination with TortoiseCVS in my > 100Mbit LAN. My Computers are quite up-to-date (~2Ghz, 512MB RAM). Still, > CVS operations are really slow (add, commit, update,...). I can see no > reason for that. The CPU usage is at about 10%-20% on both - client and > server - computers. Same with the network utilisation which is around 5%. >
what is the access method? pserver, rsh, ssh, smb mounted directory, CVSNT method? Is your name server working well? (should take < 10 seconds to nslookup all 254 names in the last octet, I know this one as I am currently experiencing a problem) does someone have a switch/hub looped through another switch/hub and back to the original switch on your network? (sure low utilization, just high burst/collision) Note, this could also be on a 10Mb sub LAN if you have some legacy equipment (thin net/thick net). BTW CVSNT questions will probably get answered better on their list. http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt > Where the hell is the bottleneck? answers to the above questions may narrow it down. > Is there a way to make CVS faster? sometimes. :) (times stated for a checkout of a 300MB tree I have worked with) using it on the physical server is as fast as you will get (I think). (1-2 Minute) using it through pserver, rsh or ssh are usually very reasonably fast on a LAN.(3-10 Minute, checked out with rsh onto a NFS mounted sandbox, both sets of trafic on the same 100Mb network) NFS/SMB mounted repository....DON'T DO IT (for other reasons, search the archive for this list for "network file system"|"SMB"|"NFS"). > > Greetings, > Michael > -- Todd Denniston Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
