Hi,
we will try to apply the patch to our server in one -
two days time. This will provide some reall life
testing. Hopefully that will show something.
H.
--- Spark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We spent most of the day trying to simulate the load
> on the server and
> trying to do some measurements. It's quite hard to
> get conclusive
> evidence to prove its faster or not. But most tests
> do show an increase
> in speed, on average about a 15% increase. When the
> server is heavily
> loaded we still have to wait around 6 seconds for a
> greeting from the pop3d.
>
> We used postal to test the performance with various
> settings. After a
> lot of calculations we found out that we have ~7
> concurrent smtp
> sessions inbound to the mailserver (all local
> deliveries) and ~25
> concurrent pop/imap users during normal hours. With
> those settings in
> postal we were not able to reproduce the problem to
> our liking.
>
> What we really need is a live test, but i can't do
> that here. My users
> would kill me ;) Maybe someone who didn't fallback
> to the old version
> (1.6.xx) can do some tests. Helmut maybe?
>
> Thanks for the quick fix anyway!
>
> Regards,
>
> Hugo
>
>
> Walter Wong wrote:
>
> > Spark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Maybe somebody can comeup with change to the code
> that can implement this??
> >
> >
> > ok, the change is in cvs. I also included a diff
> below.
> >
> > Please let us know if this makes things any better
> (or worse).
> >
> > Walter
> >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
