Joe Rhett wrote:
>
> It's not possible at that level, which is what I was saying.
>
> The best way is to have the client log into a single hostname with a single
> IP (and single matching certificate) but provide domain information during
> the login.
This is indeed a better idea, which already has been discussed. My
opinion is that the server should have the option to implicitly set it's
realm information, since you don't always have the information you need
from the client to set the realm. If you don't like it, don't use it. :)
The main point of this is to actually get some virtual hosting within a
single mailstore. The use_ip_as_realm patch will provide most of the
changes needed to do either named or ip vhosts, primarily how
information (mailboxes, acls, message flags, etc) is seperated across
realms so you can have bob@realm1 and bob@realm2 who are different
users.
--
Todd Nemanich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Protecting the opulent and staging moral standard,
They expect redemption of character and self growth"
Bad Religion - Inner Logic
