On Fri, 4 May 2001, Joe Rhett wrote:

> > I have a suggestion on this subject. What about the possibility of
> > binding a realm to a local address for cyrus (IP based vhost)? Yes,
> > authentication and named vhosts via username and realm is ideal, but
> > given that that information is usually not explicitly send by the
> > client, if the imap server could assign the realm based on some implicit
> > information such as the IP address, then there is an answer that should
> > work while we all wait for more widespread support of SASL realms. If
> > there was a patch to do this, would it be accepted into CVS?
> 
> It does mean that you must get an SSL certificate per IP address, if using
> SSL. This would make other approaches seem better.

Joe, SASL is not SSL. *plonk*

-alex

Reply via email to