>>>>> On Sat, 12 May 2001 12:56:41 +0200 (CEST),
>>>>> Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nj) writes:
nj> You mean, multithread the daemon? Or multithread cyrus? If you were to
nj> multithread cyrus, you'd have to do it with pop3, lmtpd and the other parts
nj> too. It would be nice, but I think that's much work.
Cyrus. Oh yeah, it would be much, much work. I imagine that's at
least partly why Apache 2.0 has taken so long to develop. However,
if performance is an issue (as it increasingly sounds like it is),
and there's a distinct possibility that multi-threading would help,
then wouldn't it be better if folks pool together their talents and
do things right?
While having a single server support multiple domains the way apache
does would be swell, it's sounding like if these various performance
issues folks are experiencing aren't resolved first, the
multi-domain support will be a moot point. The again, I may not
know what the hell I'm talking about.
--
Amos
