On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:14:00PM +0000, simon wrote: > > > > > > > You could use Net::LMTP instead ?? ( or support both) > > > > Can Net::LMTP force a message to be delivered even if the mailbox is over > > quota? > > Erm I think so definitely patch it in easily having had a brief look > at the LMTP RFC. >
That sounds cool. If a patched version of Net::LMTP that supports forced quota delivery exists I would prefer to use it. Let me know where I can download it. I have Net-LMTP-0.02 now and also don't see anything about using Unix Sockets to handle delivery. > > Yeah, saw the man page. Was getting lmtp socket errors calling it from the > > command line by hand. I figured I was missing something an example would be > > enough to set me straight. > > Dont have one... to hand ( probably permissions on lmtp socket if it > is a unix socket) > Yeah, that's what I thought too. Then I tried my command as root and got the same lmtp socket error. :) Maybe I'm being stupid about this. What's the easiest way to get a message into the users INBOX by passing any quota restrictions? I thought it would be deliver but it may not be. -- Regards, Scott Russell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE. T/L 441-9289 / External 919-543-9289 http://bzimage.raleigh.ibm.com/webcam
