Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >On Fri, 17 May 2002, Jeremy Howard wrote: > > >>I believe (?) that this issue is less important on Solaris, because I >>think that it handles close() differently to Linux. However on Linux it >>is vital to flush receive buffers and call shutdown() to avoid hanging >>connections. >> >> > >I am still studying the shutdown issue. BTW, why didn't you shutdown() all >streams at once, and then sleeped, instead of shutdown() and sleep one at a >time? > > Because it was late at night and I wasn't thinking straight... ;-)
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process counting ... Scott Adkins
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process coun... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process ... Scott Russell
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Scott Russell
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Ken Murchison
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Scott Adkins
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Ken Murchison
- Re: [PATCH] Updated ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process coun... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process ... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh