> > However it does seem that when explicit paths are called for certain > > componants they should be placed in line before the assumed system paths.
> I agree 100% that the paths should be honored. However, since it works > for most people, and testing is pretty annoying (as ken stated), I'm not > terribly eager to spend my time doing it, when I could be working on > performance or feature improvements elsewhere in the code. > > If there was a patch provided that I could look at, approve, and apply, > I'd be willing to do so. Ah -- that is all I was waiting to hear. Patch will be coming up. > to read a bug report hidden inside of a rant that seems to assume that the > developers of Cyrus are part of a consipracy against all system > administrators everywhere. Wow. Somehow you got something (er, a lot of things!) from my message I never intended. All I was complaining about was that the application of the --with-path= stuff was very non-intuitive, and your average "./configure ; make ; make install" person has no chance of figuring this out. -- Joe Rhett Chief Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISite Services, Inc.