> First off, why did you feel the need to send this directly to me? Cyrus > is not _my_ software, I'm just a contributor. Secondly, I can > understand your frustration, but your shitty attitude ain't gonna help. Sorry, I misunderstood clearly, as I thought you were heading up the imapd 2.2 branch.
> A lot of bitching, and no proposed fixes. It works for me, and I'm sure > it works for CMU, otherwise it would've been fixed already. Since I I would happily submit a patch .. but I want to make sure it would be accepted or at least considered. I've lost too much time over the years putting together a clean patch to fix something only to find that the maintainers had no interest in _ever_ accepting said patch. So I toss out a query about it before I do it. And before you say "Then why the complaint?" -- because I did toss out such a query. Twice. Once on this list, and once on the SASL list. With no takers on the issue. > Have people forgotten how much they _paid_ for this software? What is > the ROI and/or price performance of this software for ISPs, freakin' > infinity? Why is it assumed that each user is _entitled_ to some level > of technical support? Not asking for technical support. Suggesting that this may solve a lot of the compilation support issues you guys receive on the list. -- Joe Rhett Chief Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISite Services, Inc.