On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Gary Mills wrote: > We do use that, and it probably does improve performance. It does have > a problem with idle browser connections that accumulate with time. > This also ties up a lot of `imapd' and `httpd' processes. It probably > needs a client timeout someplace. I haven't had time to investigate > further.
I'm not sure how the httpd processes are being tied up, but "tied up" imapds that are otherwise idle don't cost you anything except some swap and a process table entry. They're basicly free. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456 Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper
