On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > Craig Ringer wrote: > > > I'd really appreciate feedback on this - what have I missed, do I have > > anything just plain wrong, etc. I've left out some things - like the > > 'shadow' mechanism of saslauthd - that seem best solved using other > > methods (getpwent in that case). Also left out are the specific-vendor > > mechanisms like saslauthd's dce and sia methods. > > Craig, this is a good start, but as Rob said, you've left out the > mechanism layer.
I'd also be much more inclined to accept this into the distribution if it was in an easily modifiable format (at this point, I suspect that means xfig, but if you have another suggestion I'm willing to listen). -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456 Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper