John Madden wrote:
I dont want to start a religious battle, but could I have some opinions
on filesystems for a 100ish user imap server? I have 2x 250G western
digital disks to use.


I think the performance of those disks (and the RAID you put on them) will
be much more significant that the filesystem you use, considering the size
of your user population.  And given that factor, I'd say that even ext3
won't give you any problems performance-wise.  Still, reiserfs, IMO, would
be preferable for mail files.

The problems you run into when using ext3 depend less on how many users you have than how many messages those users put into individual folders. Even with 100 users, if they are heavy users, you can have noticable slowdowns if many of them keep more than 5000 messages in their INBOX. Using a filesystem without indexes means each fs access will run a linear scan through the list of files in the directory. Of course, having more users compounds the problem.


I agree with the RAID-1 suggestion. At least use the md driver to run a mirror. I did this on an old box a while back, mirrored two IDE drives using Linux's software RAID, for a box with over 100 users, and it worked well.

--
Jules Agee
System Administrator
Pacific Coast Feather Co.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      x284
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Reply via email to