>> mostly guessing, but the unfiltered and rendered page contains much more >> information while the "sanitised" one contains just a *really* long URL >> (which, another guess, probably contains the recepient's ID embedded) with >> no other details visible; > >> you raise an interesting point, and in my mythical spare time it would >> be intriguing to fire up Wireshark to see what actually gets loaded when >> opening such a message; from past experience when looking what gets >> loaded when an innocuous looking web news page is opened with a browser, >> the picture is not pretty ... > > I just tested on my machine, and no images are fetched until I go M-x > gnus-article-show-images here. > > So I think you should scrounge up some mythical spare time and back up > your bug report with some data.
it's not going to happen; i never claimed images were loaded; in fact images were never mentioned on my side, that's something you've introduced into discussion and ran with it; at this stage i'm not seeing any images and am happy with the suggested solution (i.e. mm-discouraged-alternatives setting) _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
