Ok, a couple of comments if I may… The biggest problem kids in the second or
third grade would likely have learning typing is a matter of scale. Keyboards
are built for adult hands. People might want to consider that when they talk
about what age keyboarding should be taught at. Perhaps phonics and basic math
skills would be a better thing to teach at that age. Lowering standards has never produced
better results; it’s just given us more reasons to lower standards. Telling me that a kid can only write at 10
words per minute is not a problem with keyboarding, it’s a problem with
creativity. Teach a little more creativity, and they should be able to write
faster. The reason for teaching a kid to type at 25 wpm or more is that any job
that requires a typing test is going to require that minimum, giving a kid an A
if they can type 10 words a minute is a disservice to the kid. As stated, the dvorak keyboard would make
typing faster. It is the most efficient layout and the qwerty keyboard was
designed actually to slow typing down so the mechanical arms would not lock
together. However, yes, it is not practical to convert all keyboards to the
dvorak style, but what is practical and possible is implementing ergonomic
keyboards so we can keep these kids from getting carpal tunnel syndrome before
they graduate. This may become a legal issue before long as we seem to be
moving the recommended curriculum over to a computer based format which will
require more and more time spent typing. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy Movall FYI... From: /color>Steve
Linduska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
- [info-tech] Fwd:Keyboarding Nancy Movall
- RE: [info-tech] Fwd:Keyboarding Kurt McKenney
- Re: [info-tech] Fwd:Keyboarding Tim Buenz
- RE: [info-tech] Fwd:Keyboarding Kurt McKenney
- RE: [info-tech] Fwd:Keyboarding Kuhl, Douglas
- RE: [info-tech] Fwd:Keyboarding Kurt McKenney