OK great, in any way I'm there to solve any false positives as I can remove
those votes and as you see I notify you team immediately of any failure so
should be a problem

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Eyal Edri <ee...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Tal Nisan <tni...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> This is how it always worked, and all due respect to Eyal's opinion I'm
>> the one handling the branch and the grades are there to help me :)
>>
>
> The reason we didn't grade the new hooks with CR -1 or VERIFY -1 is
> because we wanted to give the new hooks enough time to see if all is
> working well, because causing false positives and un-needed noise,
> nothing to do with my opinions.
>
> Since we see now that its working well, we can enable the enforcement
> back, so if its VERIFY then yea, let's enable it.
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Shlomo Ben David <sbend...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Tal - Ok, so basically I didn't apply the verified grades on any hooks
>>> accept the check_bug_url hook.
>>>
>>> Eyal - Is it ok to add the verify (+/-)1 grade for the check_backport
>>> hook?
>>> (I thought that we'll grade with negative value if something went wrong)
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Shlomi Ben-David | Software Engineer | Red Hat ISRAEL
>>> RHCSA | RHCE
>>> IRC: shlomibendavid (on #rhev-integ, #rhev-dev, #rhev-ci)
>>>
>>> OPEN SOURCE - 1 4 011 && 011 4 1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Tal Nisan <tni...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The hook found out that the patch is open in master which precedes
>>>> ovirt-engine-4.1 and thus should have gotten -verified in 4.1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Shlomo Ben David <sbend...@redhat.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tal,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that the Check Backport hook is doing exactly what you asking
>>>>> for.
>>>>> Example [1]:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Check Backport::IGNORE, The patch backported to all newer
>>>>>    branches.(open in 'master' branch/es) found not relevant branch/es:
>>>>>    'ovirt-engine-4.0' (not exist in the newer branches list)
>>>>>
>>>>> patch branch: ovirt-engine-4.1
>>>>> newer branches: 'master' (open)
>>>>> older (not relevant) branches: ovirt-engine-4.0
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's not what you meant, please explain :)
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/68862
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Shlomi Ben-David | Software Engineer | Red Hat ISRAEL
>>>>> RHCSA | RHCE
>>>>> IRC: shlomibendavid (on #rhev-integ, #rhev-dev, #rhev-ci)
>>>>>
>>>>> OPEN SOURCE - 1 4 011 && 011 4 1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Tal Nisan <tni...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Check out this patches for instance: https://gerrit.ovirt
>>>>>> .org/#/c/68862 https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/68861
>>>>>> Those are 4.1 and 4.0 patches that are open on master, I'd expect to
>>>>>> see them get -verified from the hooks which they didn't:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - Update Tracker::#1406042::OK, status: POST
>>>>>>    - Check Bug-Url::OK
>>>>>>    - Check Product::#1406042::OK, product: ovirt-engine
>>>>>>    - Check TM::#1406042::OK, found clone candidate ovirt-4.0.zfor
>>>>>>    target milestone: ovirt-4.0.7
>>>>>>    - Set POST::#1406042::IGNORE, bug is already in 'POST' status
>>>>>>    - Check Backport::IGNORE, The patch backported to all newer
>>>>>>    branches.(open in 'master' branch/es) found not relevant branch/es:
>>>>>>    'ovirt-engine-4.0' (not exist in the newer branches list)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was the flow before and it made my life easier as I didn't have
>>>>>> to actively search for cherry-picks in all other branches to see if it 
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> be merged
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Infra mailing list
>>>>>> Infra@ovirt.org
>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Eyal Edri
> Associate Manager
> RHV DevOps
> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> Red Hat Israel
>
> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018>
> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Reply via email to