Ben,
What are u doing about Spam issues with your iMS version?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 3:50 PM
To: inFusion Support List
Subject: Re: [iMS] Potentially stupid question about rcpt.cfm and post.cfm
[SpamTri: 91, 1.0]

If you pass result=UnknownUser, then iMS rejects the message and returns it
to the sender.  You want to do that with any inbound email you don't
recognize.



On Dec 21, 2007, at F Dec 21, 07 543PM, Dave Hatz wrote:

> Ben & Kym,
> What benefit do you get by changing RCPT template with UnknownUser or 
> Accept?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 8:55 AM
> To: inFusion Support List
> Subject: Re: [iMS] Potentially stupid question about rcpt.cfm and 
> post.cfm
> [SpamTri: 91, 1.0]
>
> Hi Kym,
>
> My RCPT template is very, very simple.  It either returns UnknownUser 
> or accept, so I think in that case, I don't need a <cfabort> to stop 
> processing the RCPT template.
>
> However, it does appear to be the case that if I return "unknownuser"
> to iMS, that it will then simply reject the inbound message, and the 
> DATA template will never be invoked, which is what I want.
>
> On a totally different subject, does anybody know if and when iMS 3.0 
> is due to come out?  I'm a little concerned that development on iMS 
> has stopped, and if so, I might have to start looking for another 
> solution (much as I don't want to).
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2007, at ThursdayDec 20, 2007 539PM, Kym Kovan wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> you wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There are certain inbound emails that I want to reject outright, 
>>> meaning I don't even want post.cfm to be invoked.  I had assumed 
>>> that by catching those emails in rcpt and putting a 
>>> "result=unknownuser"
>>> in rcpt.cfm that iMS would do the "right"
>>> thing and abort further processing.  However, it would appear that 
>>> this is, in fact, not the case.  Is there any way that I can 
>>> instruct iMS to stop processing within the rcpt.cfm file?
>>>
>>> If that's a bad idea, then "that's a bad idea" is a perfectly 
>>> acceptable response.
>>>
>>
>> What I have sprinkled everywhere is:
>>
>> result=UnknownUser
>> <cfabort>
>>
>> and they work like charmers.
>>
>> Depending on what your rcpt.cfm code looks like you could spit 
>> several "result=..."s back to iMS so we stop the template dead in its 
>> tracks after the failing result. Then there is no chance of another 
>> result being fed back to the server.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doing that we certainly don't get any further processing. We do 
>> exactly the same in helo.cfm and mail.cfm dor the same reason, kill 
>> the baddies as early as possible.
>>
>>
>> All the best to everyone for the festive season and the New Year.
>>
>> Kym K
==^=======================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS  "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as a free service.  Although we will try to address issues
in a timely manner, support via this list is not guaranteed.  If you require 
expedited
support then a support contract is required.  Support may be purchased from
http://www.coolfusion.com/commerce.  Details regarding support options may be 
reviewed
at: http://www.coolfusion.com/SupportOptions.cfm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at 
http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/
Need an iMS Developer license?  Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/Developers/
List archives: http://www.coolfusion.com/cfbb/
Note: You are subscribed as archive_jab_org / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^=======================================================


Reply via email to