Hi all, 

We're having a small issuette with class dots, by this I mean we have an email which 
we send that has style tags and classes.  If we do a normal send with the CFX tag then 
the email ends up OK.  If we create a query and pass the query to the tag (for a bulk 
send) then the email doesnât look quite right.

After much playing around it turns out to do with dots.  The top of our html looks 
something like...

<html>
<head>
<style>
Tr,td {}
.white {}
.foo {}
</style>

Looking at the final source in the email client the single sends are fine, the bulk 
send's style tag looks like

<style>
Tr,td {}
white {}
foo {}
</style>

Stopping the iMS Post service so that we can get what the post service was going to 
send shows that single sends doubles up the dots where as the URLEncoded version of 
the bulk send does not.

Does anyone know whats going on here and how to rectify this (ideally without having 
to change the template as this is created by 3rd parties so we donât have full 
control of this process)

TIA

Mikey

==^=======================================================
This list server is Powered by iMS  "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as a free service.  Although we will try to address issues
in a timely manner, support via this list is not guaranteed.  If you require expedited
support then a support contract is required.  Support may be purchased from
http://www.coolfusion.com/commerce.  Details regarding support options may be reviewed
at: http://www.coolfusion.com/SupportOptions.cfm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at http://www.coolfusion.com/Support/
Need an iMS Developer license?  Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/Developers/
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^=======================================================


Reply via email to