Am Freitag, 9. Februar 2007 00:46:35 schrieb Ismael Luceno: > Jens Persson escribió: > > Oh, come on. Parsing those textfiles takes just a few milliseconds. They > > are very small too so no need to switch to a binary format. About how to > > sort .i files I guess that could be done in many ways but maybe we could > > start with taking a vote on if we should split up system in two > > directories? > > > > And on a related note, I asked a while back if there will be stable > > versions but it was turned down then. But sooner or later there should > > be stable versions, otherwise Initng will always just be seen upon as a > > "hacking playground". Odd numbers could be devel versions and equal > > could be stable. IE if we start changing the API that should be done in > > a 0.7.x devel series, which will eventually end up in a 0.8.x stable > > series. And new development will go into 0.9.x and so forth. > > We can not guarantee that there will be no api changes. > > What we need to do is keep bugfixing 0.6.x after 0.6.x+1 release, > until it's tested for a couple of weeks. So we will be releasing > 0.6.x.y's until 0.6.x+1 is considered stable :). > > Also, we should standarize the version bumping process. > > What i propose is: > > o.o.x minor or no api changes (no breakage). > o.x.o api changes that break things (API_VERSION bump). > x.o.o core rewrites, and the like. > > Well, based on this, the current release should be called 0.7.0 :P.
we should create in svn new dirs for this, then. 0.7/trunk 0.7/1 0.7/2 this allowes a stable directory (0.7/1) and a development dir (0.7/trunk).
pgp4dJqryoc6o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
