Ismael Luceno wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jens Persson escribió:
>   
>> Arrrgh!
>> Right now there are no stable releases. What I want are two branches, 
>> one devel and one stable. Think of how GNOME does it, that's what I'm 
>> asking for. 2.16.x is stable and only gets bugfixes and 2.17.x is devel 
>> and gets all the new stuff. So only two sources needed to do it that 
>> way. No need to create new tags and branches of every file release, 
>> that's just crazy.
>>     
>
> Well, after re-reading your mail I got it :P. (I thinked you were
> talking about initng-ifiles XD).
>
> But I still think we don't need that separation, that's better for
> bigger projects, but for initng it's non-sense.
>
> In practice it's the same, because we will keep bugfixing the previous
> stable release until the current one is considered stable, so the
> current release will be considered unstable until we say it's stable.
>
> However, we can't consider any 0.6.x release stable :(, so that
> doesn't matter until the next release..
Fair enough. When we reach IE 0.7.17 then we can decide if there are a 
need for a 0.8 stable branch.

-- 
_______________________________________________
Initng mailing list
[email protected]
http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng

Reply via email to