Enrico Scholz escribió: > Ismael Luceno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm thinking about moving the current code added by runiscript to a >> wrapper script. > > mmh... good performance was formerly a big advantage of initng. I fear > this will be given up when the initscripts are bloaty bash-scripts > instead of the small i-files.
I guess there isn't a noticeable performance impact, because the iparser plugin has to read and copy the data inside the ifiles, while runiscript will not waste time on that... Anyway, in some future we could replace bash with our own shell, so we can provide the ibin commands as builtins. > The new bash replacement scripts seem to be more complicated and complex > than the old i-files. I think they look similar to sysvinit scripts ;P. > I guess, new goal is to make initng a SysV clone with some new features > like parallel script execution, right? No, but with this approach we could make a compatibility wrapper that let you use old scripts without modifications. And maybe other weird things... ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
