Enrico Scholz escribió: > Ismael Luceno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm thinking about moving the current code added by runiscript to a >> wrapper script. > > mmh... good performance was formerly a big advantage of initng. I fear > this will be given up when the initscripts are bloaty bash-scripts > instead of the small i-files. > > The new bash replacement scripts seem to be more complicated and complex > than the old i-files. > > I guess, new goal is to make initng a SysV clone with some new features > like parallel script execution, right? >
Well, maybe I should explain my plan... The ifiles stuff needs a lot of features that make the initng core big, while with the new service_file format we can move most of the functionality out of the core, and remove the rest. Also we will reimplement active_db in a tree-like way, and maybe use hashes... That will make the core very fast, and compact. I hope that after 0.7 we could make our own shell, and maybe we can implement a cache to make it faster ;).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
