-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:18:03AM -0300, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> El Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:33:42 +0400
> I don't care much about that because we can't support those restricted
> environments anyway.
> <...>
> But there might be problems related to message queues that I'm not
> taking into account...
It's obviously an elegant feature, that's true. Using two message queues will
give us bi-directional communication. We can do multiplexing, if we want to,
using IDs or something like that.
Whether you want to support embedded devices or not is mostly not a decision
based on technology, but on our/your preferences. I, personnally, think we
shouldn't knowingly place obstacles in the path of those who want to use
InitNG on an embedded devices, but that's 100% up to you. :-)
The only thing that I fear we loose is some bit of backwards compatibility
with the old init, i.e. the possiblity to control InitNG through the old
"shutdown" tool. That's all.
-- Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqKZ0gACgkQhS0drJ3goJKSAACfXXOKaTEUiqosxno3pOvFVW8r
RcQAnjQdtBdHWgZoHxyG3pNtbMCSqquN
=wYJY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
_______________________________________________
Initng mailing list
[email protected]
http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
