-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 06:33:21AM -0300, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> I don't see POSIX mq as an obstacle. Probably a slimmer implementation
> cloud be made if needed, and we can even ignore priorities, but it's
> just a few kb...
I fear it's only up to the guys who build the kernel for the embedded devices.
But then again, perhaps they add the code because they want to use InitNG?
> > The only thing that I fear we loose is some bit of backwards
> > compatibility with the old init, i.e. the possiblity to control
> > InitNG through the old "shutdown" tool. That's all.
>
> We already are incompatible. In fact, this can be an excuse to
> implement a better emulation layer ;).
I hoped that this would come automatically in case we decide to use sockets.
:-)
-- Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqKfhAACgkQhS0drJ3goJKmHACeJxBzSIFIzexmMhSiG3K/VKUg
Qg4AnA9veK9TkwYg+UMFzzl1a8gT+aUn
=DQGD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
_______________________________________________
Initng mailing list
[email protected]
http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
